Tuesday, 24 April 2012

More ex-wife coming back

Cathy (ex wife) wants to try again.

We do have a few business-end things to settle but I'm game - she can come and stay over winter on Waiheke. It's basically a cabin in the bush, dark and cold in winter: cabin fever. That should stress any relationship - we get through that we should be OK.

Nothing is set in stone just yet - lots of room for things to go wrong.
I suspect this blog will fill with observations on relationships for a while.

Monday, 16 April 2012

Food Post

Ex wife stayed over last night - I cooked lamb-chops in honey and mint, tossed (heated) frozen mixed veg with rice and a bit of butter for the side. The talk is reconciliation - ex-wives know all your vulnerable spots.

Saturday, 7 April 2012

Ferrero and Lindt and Chocolaty Ethics

There is a petition getting a lot of play online:

End child slave labour in your chocolate this Easter

... it says.

Lindt and Ferrero chocolates use suppliers who use forced child labor - it is alleged.
Cocoa is sourced mainly from Africa, from countries with extreme poverty. In these countries it is not uncommon for every member of the family to work just to stay afloat. Removing custom from these people without another way to make a living will just make their situation even more desperate.

One of the ways to improve things is to source products under contracts which improve the conditions of workers with respect to their economies. There are exploitative conditions where employers keep large profits to themselves, where there could be a more equitable distribution of wealth, and this can be enforced by contract. You want to be my source of raw materials, you have to provide decent conditions for your workers.

The claims in the petition are very worrying - so I took some trouble to check them out.

With Lindt, I found they publish their contractual terms of conduct for suppliers - which do in fact require decent workplace conditions and the most stringent standards available for human rights. Slavery, any form of coerced labor, and child labor are expressly forbidden. In response to emails, the company strongly and credibly reasserts that they ethically source their cocoa.

I have tried but cannot find any recent evidence that either company is not enforcing their contracts.

However - reading between the lines the complaint is not that the companies cocoa is unethically sourced but that they have not made a commitment against child labor. Well clearly they both have made a public statement of commitment so I wonder if the problem is that they have failed to join a particular scheme?

There is a problem with this in that there are no standard schemes to ensure ethical sourcing. A company that fails to sign up to one may still have committed to another or just enforce their contracts in-house.

Campaigns like this are harmful to human rights activism in general and genuine child/slave labor efforts in particular. They harm these efforts by distracting attention from genuine trouble-spots and generally muddying the issues: they are crying wolf.

Before passing on a sensational claim heard over the internet, do check it out. But also - check before dismissing one. Better yet - if you start a campaign - make it easy for people to check by linking to the sources you use to support your claims. If you do not provide evidence, do not expect support.